Events & Resources

Learning Center
Read through guides, explore resource hubs, and sample our coverage.
Learn More
Events
Register for an upcoming webinar and track which industry events our analysts attend.
Learn More
Podcasts
Listen to our podcast, Behind the Numbers for the latest news and insights.
Learn More

About

Our Story
Learn more about our mission and how EMARKETER came to be.
Learn More
Our Clients
Key decision-makers share why they find EMARKETER so critical.
Learn More
Our People
Take a look into our corporate culture and view our open roles.
Join the Team
Our Methodology
Rigorous proprietary data vetting strips biases and produces superior insights.
Learn More
Newsroom
See our latest press releases, news articles or download our press kit.
Learn More
Contact Us
Speak to a member of our team to learn more about EMARKETER.
Contact Us

X files federal antitrust lawsuit charging GARM with coordinating a platform boycott

The news: X has filed a federal antitrust lawsuit against an advertising industry coalition, targeting the Global Alliance for Responsible Media (GARM) and several of its members, including CVS Health, Mars, and Unilever.

  • The suit alleges that GARM (which X rejoined just last month) and its affiliates orchestrated an advertising boycott of X after Elon Musk acquired the platform in 2022.
  • In an open letter, X CEO Linda Yaccarino condemned GARM's actions, asserting that they have harmed both the advertising industry and the marketplace of ideas.
  • This legal action comes in response to a significant decline in X's advertising revenues, which have fallen from $4.5 billion in 2021 to $1.91 billion this year, per our forecast. Internal documents reveal a troubling trend, with US sales dropping 25% in Q2 2024 from the previous quarter and 53% year over year, causing Musk to go on a charm offensive at Cannes Lions.
  • X has pledged to invest in content moderation to address these issues, but it does still have demonstrable brand safety problems: Platform ads recently appeared alongside content with hashtags like “#whitepower” and Holocaust denial, per CNBC.

Why it matters: This lawsuit surfaces the tension between social media platforms' pursuit of free speech and advertisers' concerns about brand safety; it arrives amid a broader investigation by the US House Judiciary Committee into whether GARM sought to limit conservative content online.

  • Social platforms grapple with balancing content moderation and advertiser expectations.
  • The outcome of this case could set important precedents for the relationship between social media companies and the advertising industry—and underscores X's ongoing struggle to achieve financial stability and regain advertiser trust following Musk's acquisition.

Our take: This legal battle highlights the complex interplay between social media platforms and advertisers in today's digital ecosystem and could have far-reaching implications for how they interact.

Irrespective of the suit’s outcome, it is critical that X becomes a more pivotal platform for advertisers, who are results-oriented and far less likely to boycott a channel that’s working well for them. The company must address its internal challenges to rebuild trust and stabilize its business.

You've read 0 of 2 free articles this month.

Get more articles - create your free account today!