Events & Resources

Learning Center
Read through guides, explore resource hubs, and sample our coverage.
Learn More
Events
Register for an upcoming webinar and track which industry events our analysts attend.
Learn More
Podcasts
Listen to our podcast, Behind the Numbers for the latest news and insights.
Learn More

About

Our Story
Learn more about our mission and how EMARKETER came to be.
Learn More
Our Clients
Key decision-makers share why they find EMARKETER so critical.
Learn More
Our People
Take a look into our corporate culture and view our open roles.
Join the Team
Our Methodology
Rigorous proprietary data vetting strips biases and produces superior insights.
Learn More
Newsroom
See our latest press releases, news articles or download our press kit.
Learn More
Contact Us
Speak to a member of our team to learn more about EMARKETER.
Contact Us

When rebrands overshadow products, brand clarity takes the hit

The news: In today’s attention economy, many companies find their rebrands becoming the story—drowning out the products or services they’re meant to elevate. From HBO Max’s naming whiplash to Apple TV’s identity blur, the narrative often shifts from innovation to confusion.

HBO Max’s misfire:

  • When Warner Bros. Discovery dropped “HBO” in 2023, it hoped to broaden appeal beyond prestige TV. Instead, “Max” became the punchline. Users asked what it stood for, critics mocked the generic name, and subscriber churn spiked, per TechCrunch.
  • The company later reversed course, going back to HBO Max in July, proving how quickly a rebrand can consume the message it was meant to simplify.

Apple TV’s echo chamber:

  • Apple’s decision to fold Apple TV+ into Apple TV looked tidy on paper. But in practice, it blurred the lines between device, app, and service.
  • Rather than focusing on new shows, coverage fixated on confusion. The conversation became about Apple’s naming problem—not its product growth, nor its content offerings.

Social fiascos:

  • Users derided X’s name change as meaningless and disconnected from Twitter’s core identity, and the rebrand failed to inspire enthusiasm or clarity. Posts are still called “tweets” in spite of the change, indicating a struggle to fully rebrand.
  • Facebook’s shift was meant to reflect its metaverse ambitions, but it came across as a forced attempt to shift public perception—especially now that the company’s focus has pivoted from the metaverse to AI.

Why it matters: Rebrands should clarify purpose, not steal the spotlight. When the audience debates what you are instead of what you offer, brand value erodes and momentum stalls.

  • Attention ≠ understanding. A viral rebrand is meaningless if it clouds user perception.
  • Narrative discipline wins. Marketers must control the story arc—why the change happened and what users gain.
  • Redirect the message. The more airtime a rebrand itself gets, the less room there is for the message.

What marketers should do: Treat rebrands as thoughtful acts of storytelling, not stunts. Build rollout campaigns that quickly return attention to your core experience. When rebranding becomes the headline, your product risks becoming the footnote.

This content is part of EMARKETER’s subscription Briefings, where we pair daily updates with data and analysis from forecasts and research reports. Our Briefings prepare you to start your day informed, to provide critical insights in an important meeting, and to understand the context of what’s happening in your industry. Non-clients can click here to get a demo of our full platform and coverage.

You've read 0 of 2 free articles this month.

Get more articles - create your free account today!