How should marketers adapt AI-companion experiences across different regions, cultures, and regulatory environments?
Marketers already have localization playbooks they can use to adapt AI-companion experiences across regions and cultures. Foundational practices like tailoring messaging to cultural norms, ensuring compliance with local AI regulations, and adjusting content for regional preferences still apply.
However, AI companions introduce new variables. Personality, tone, and conversational style may require region-specific tuning; regulations around AI vary significantly; and companion platforms may roll out ad formats at different speeds globally. Accounting for these factors will help marketers design experiences and campaigns that are culturally aligned, regulatory compliant, and consistent with how AI companions naturally interact with users in each region.
What ethical, trust, and emotional-risk issues should marketers consider when placing ads within AI companions?
Ethical concerns surrounding AI companions are multiplying, and marketers need to approach the field with caution. Recent controversies—like a Character AI lawsuit over a young user dying by suicide after engaging with the platform—and regulatory investigations highlight public skepticism around the safety and emotional influence of these platforms.
When developing AI companion experiences or placing ads within them, marketers must consider the risks of being associated with content that is scrutinized for being deceptive, emotionally manipulative, or harmful to vulnerable users. Monitoring platforms for transparency, emotional safeguards, and age-appropriate restrictions is critical to protect users and maintain brand trust amid intensifying scrutiny.
This means that marketers must:
- Validate whether AI partners disclose how their companions work, including what data is collected and how companion personalities are shaped.
- Ensure companions have emotional safety systems in place, such as having concrete escalation pathways and the ability to refuse certain requests.
- Offer clear age-gating protocols with parental controls.
- And allow brand-level visibility into conversations, risk flags, and how inappropriate interactions are addressed.
Which early case studies show how marketers are succeeding with advertising in AI chatbots?
Early tests show that ads within AI chatbots are already delivering meaningful results. Microsoft Copilot, one of the first major AI platforms to integrate advertising, reported a 153% lift in clickthrough rates and a 54% improvement in user experience from Copilot ads across verticals compared with traditional search. Microsoft’s AI-powered Performance Max campaigns in Copilot have raised clickthrough rates by an average 273% across major categories versus traditional seach. Together, these outcomes indicate that advertising within AI interfaces is already proving itself to be a key performance driver.
What should marketers expect from AI companions in the next 12–24 months—and how can they position themselves now?
Marketers should expect both rising consumer adoption of AI companions and expanding opportunities to advertise within these environments as platforms look for new monetization paths. At the same time, ethical and safety concerns will continue to attract public and regulatory attention, making brand-safe execution a key priority over the next 12–24 months.
To position themselves now, marketers can begin working with general-purpose chatbots like Microsoft Copilot to understand how ads perform within AI environments. Experimentation will inform marketers on whether advertising within dedicated AI companion environments—if these opportunities arise—is a worthwhile investment.
Questions for Brands
Why do AI companions matter for brands—and what new opportunities do they create in engagement and loyalty?
Brands understand that consumers are more receptive to purchase recommendations from trusted sources. AI companions—by building familiarity, emotional rapport, and daily conversational habits—have strong potential to become one of those sources if platforms begin offering ads.
Experimenting with AI companions now also offers early adopter advantages: Brands that work with the first platforms to incorporate ads could build deeper affinity with users who show high levels of emotional engagement, foster brand familiarity with consumers before competitors, and gain first access to richer engagement opportunities in companions that track users’ moods, preferences, and long-term goals. And given that many companion users engage for extended conversational sessions, early adopters would benefit from high-attention environments.
Rather than relying on traditional advertising, which struggles to overcome record-low trust, AI companions can introduce products and recommendations as part of an ongoing, trusted dialogue. Companions are seen as sincere, authentic, and trustworthy—creating an opportunity for ads placed within these environments to achieve higher retention, more frequent interactions, and repeat purchases driven by comfort and credibility.
How could government inquiries and policy debates in the US affect AI companions, and how should brands respond?
AI companions face growing regulatory scrutiny regarding how minors interact with the platforms. In September, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) launched an investigation into seven providers—including mainstream chatbots like OpenAI and companions like Character Technologies—to assess potential risks to minors. The inquiry examines how these platforms monetize engagement, shape character behavior, and enforce age controls.
This suggests stricter rules are coming to address addictive engagement patterns, data use, and protections for young users. For brands, the investigation underscores that while AI companions offer new avenues for engagement, any marketing or partnership strategy must account for future regulatory clampdowns and greater accountability for how brand content appears within companion experiences.
How can brands assess whether their technology, data, and organizational capabilities are ready to support AI-companion initiatives?
Brands need to make sure they can support safe, high-trust, conversational engagement before they integrate advertising into AI companions.
Categories like lifestyle, wellness, entertainment, and education are generally better suited to companion environments. Higher-risk categories such as alcohol or gambling face steeper safety and regulatory challenges when ads appear alongside emotionally sensitive conversations.
Technologically, brands must ensure they can provide structured product and content data (e.g., tagged product catalogs, FAQs, or usage guides) that platforms can ingest to deliver accurate, contextual recommendations within the companion’s dialogue. They also need the ability to review and audit how their brand is surfaced, including through conversation-context logs, brand-mention dashboards, safety flags, or transcripts associated with triggered recommendations.
Organizationally, brands need cross-functional teams—marketing, legal, privacy, and brand safety—to review partner capabilities, approve guardrails, and monitor how ads are delivered inside real user conversations. Brands require clear escalation protocols for when a platform identifies risky placements or when an ad appears near sensitive content, ensuring fast remediation and consistent, responsible participation in AI-companion ecosystems.
This FAQ was prepared with the assistance of generative AI tools to support content organization, summarization, and drafting. All AI-generated contributions have been reviewed, fact-checked, and verified for accuracy and originality by EMARKETER editors. Any recommendations reflect EMARKETER’s research and human judgment.