It is also worth noting that size does not necessarily constitute efficacy. For example, the affiliate channel can serve as the perfect proving ground for smaller influencers who do not have large follower bases, but have a highly engaged audience. The inherent low-risk nature of the channel affords influencers an opportunity to showcase their ability to brands who may be skeptical or hesitant to invest in a campaign on a flat-fee basis.
Rather than risking high up-front campaign fees, brands and influencers can engage on a variable basis, test driving the relationship to see what type of value the partnership can drive before investing further. This alternative model helps influencers get their foot in the door with brands, while alleviating risk for both parties.
On the brand side, influencer platforms are many. But investing in influencer technology alone will not result in overnight success, nor will it come without an investment of time. Marketers should instead consider their existing channel partners—specifically affiliate partners—to test out influencer campaigns and their ability to drive value. The channel’s pay-for-performance model offers a low initial investment and eliminates barriers to entry.
The lines in digital channels are becoming more blurred, as are the functions on the brand side, with more teams using affiliate and affiliate managers to manage partnerships that were historically owned by public relations teams.
The takeaway? Before investing time, dollars, and resources, embrace the blurred lines and endeavor to prove out your influencer marketing proof of concept with all the benefits of performance models.
—Maura Smith, CMO, Partnerize