The news: Gap is partnering with Hailey Bieber on a limited-edition denim capsule and campaign built around jeans modeled on her favorite vintage Gap fit, per Adweek.

• The “Hailey Jean” comes in two fits—Extra Baggy and ‘90s Low Rise Loose—and six washes. The collection features Bieber's signature printed inside the pocket lining and 1996 branding, a nod to her birth year and Gap's denim heyday.
• A film set in a ’90s bedroom, scored to The Cranberries’ 1993 track “Linger,” was teased on Gap’s social channels ahead of the capsule’s July 16 launch online and in select stores across the US, Canada, UK, France, and Japan.

Zooming out: The capsule and campaign follow a playbook Gap has used in recent years with stars including Troye Sivan, Gwyneth Paltrow with daughter Apple Martin, and Katseye. One of the clearest examples is its work with Katseye, which has spanned multiple collaborations. These include the “Better in Denim” campaign, where the group danced to “Milkshake” while wearing low-rise jeans, baggy fits, and denim corsets from Gap’s fall collection, as well as an exclusive six-piece hoodie collection tied to its 2026 Coachella debut.

The common thread across the campaigns is how they use celebrities to center attention on the brand and products. That contrasts with American Eagle's Sydney Sweeney campaign, which leaned into a pun about “good jeans” that sparked accusations of promoting eugenics. American Eagle largely stayed quiet rather than address the resulting backlash directly.

Implications for marketers: Gap and American Eagle both tapped celebrities to reintroduce denim to shoppers who grew up watching their parents wear it, but the two brands took different paths to get attention. American Eagle’s campaign worked because the backlash itself generated the impressions, even though the brand absorbed reputational risk and a bruising news cycle in the process. Gap's Bieber campaign instead keeps the spotlight on the jeans, the fit, the washes, and a soundtrack built to trigger familiarity rather than debate.

Gap can take that approach because it has a credibility advantage. The brand was synonymous with denim in the 1990s, so its use of nostalgia feels earned rather than manufactured. That distinction shapes the durability of each campaign’s impact. American Eagle’s approach may drive short-term sales but risks lingering brand damage, while Gap’s strategy carries less downside but depends more on the product resonating without the boost of controversy.

This content is part of EMARKETER’s subscription Briefings, where we pair daily updates with data and analysis from forecasts and research reports. Our Briefings prepare you to start your day informed, to provide critical insights in an important meeting, and to understand the context of what’s happening in your industry. Non-clients can click here to get a demo of our full platform and coverage.