The news: Bayer filed a false advertising lawsuit against Johnson & Johnson over its promotions that compared J&J’s prostate cancer drug Erleada to Bayer’s rival drug Nubeqa.
Why it matters: This litigation signals a departure from the industry’s usual preference for FDA-led complaints, arriving just as federal regulators tighten their oversight of direct-to-consumer drug ads.
Implications for pharma marketers and agencies: The current environment underscores the broad increased scrutiny that marketers face from regulatory agencies and rivals around consumer-facing claims, risk disclosures, and real-world study data outside of clinical trials.
The allegation that AI tools are amplifying promotional claims adds a new consideration for pharma marketers and agencies when creating ads. Even when marketers control the original messaging, AI search can surface, summarize, or reframe those claims outside the intended context. If courts or regulators begin factoring AI into enforcement, pharma advertisers will face added pressure to more carefully vet and substantiate comparative messaging before it circulates widely online.
This content is part of EMARKETER’s subscription Briefings, where we pair daily updates with data and analysis from forecasts and research reports. Our Briefings prepare you to start your day informed, to provide critical insights in an important meeting, and to understand the context of what’s happening in your industry. Not a subscriber? Click here to get a demo of our full platform and coverage.
You've read 0 of 2 free articles this month.
One Liberty Plaza9th FloorNew York, NY 100061-800-405-0844
1-800-405-0844sales@emarketer.com