Events & Resources

Learning Center
Read through guides, explore resource hubs, and sample our coverage.
Learn More
Events
Register for an upcoming webinar and track which industry events our analysts attend.
Learn More
Podcasts
Listen to our podcast, Behind the Numbers for the latest news and insights.
Learn More

About

Our Story
Learn more about our mission and how EMARKETER came to be.
Learn More
Our Clients
Key decision-makers share why they find EMARKETER so critical.
Learn More
Our People
Take a look into our corporate culture and view our open roles.
Join the Team
Our Methodology
Rigorous proprietary data vetting strips biases and produces superior insights.
Learn More
Newsroom
See our latest press releases, news articles or download our press kit.
Learn More
Contact Us
Speak to a member of our team to learn more about EMARKETER.
Contact Us

Pepsi faces FTC suit over unfair pricing

The news: The FTC sued PepsiCo for illegal price discrimination last week, marking its final action under former chair Lina Khan as well as the Biden administration’s last attempt to shape antitrust enforcement.

The details of the case: The suit is the FTC’s second in as many months to invoke the Robinson-Patman Act (RPA), which makes it illegal for sellers to offer buyers different prices for the same goods unless the difference can be justified by higher distribution costs.

  • Pepsi is accused of offering an unnamed big-box retailer—which sources identified to CNBC as Walmart—an unfair price advantage over competitors ranging from big grocery chains to local convenience stores.
  • The FTC’s suit argues that Pepsi violated the RPA by giving Walmart advantages, such as “promotional payments” and advertising, which it did not offer to rival retailers.

Pepsi “strongly disputes” the allegations and plans to “vigorously present” its case in court, the company said in a statement.

What happens next? Whether the case proceeds depends on current FTC chair Andrew Ferguson, who made his displeasure known in a withering dissent that called the suit a “political bludgeon” reliant on “an academic theory devoid of evidence.”

  • Ferguson noted that he has no objection to enforcing the RPA, provided there is evidence that a company has violated the act and that it has enough market power to stifle competition.
  • But his objection to the Khan FTC’s interpretation of the act underscores the Trump administration’s much more conservative approach to antitrust enforcement—one that will likely have a narrower remit and favor settlements over lengthy court cases.

This article is part of EMARKETER’s client-only subscription Briefings—daily newsletters authored by industry analysts who are experts in marketing, advertising, media, and tech trends. To help you start 2025 off on the right foot, articles like this one—delivering the latest news and insights—are completely free through January 31, 2025. If you want to learn how to get insights like these delivered to your inbox every day, and get access to our data-driven forecasts, reports, and industry benchmarks, schedule a demo with our sales team.

You've read 0 of 2 free articles this month.

Create an account for uninterrupted access to select articles.
Create a Free Account