Events & Resources

Learning Center
Read through guides, explore resource hubs, and sample our coverage.
Learn More
Events
Register for an upcoming webinar and track which industry events our analysts attend.
Learn More
Podcasts
Listen to our podcast, Behind the Numbers for the latest news and insights.
Learn More

About

Our Story
Learn more about our mission and how EMARKETER came to be.
Learn More
Our Clients
Key decision-makers share why they find EMARKETER so critical.
Learn More
Our People
Take a look into our corporate culture and view our open roles.
Join the Team
Our Methodology
Rigorous proprietary data vetting strips biases and produces superior insights.
Learn More
Newsroom
See our latest press releases, news articles or download our press kit.
Learn More
Contact Us
Speak to a member of our team to learn more about EMARKETER.
Contact Us

The cost of Instacart’s price-testing experiment continues to mount

The situation: The fallout from Instacart’s price-testing experiment, which caused some consumers to pay higher grocery prices, continues to build.

  • New York Attorney General Letitia James sent a letter to Instacart demanding detailed information about its price-setting practices, raising the possibility that the test violated a new state law.
  • That move followed intensifying national scrutiny, driven in part by lawmakers publicly calling out the company. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York urged the Federal Trade Commission to investigate, Rep. Angie Craig of Minnesota accused Instacart of “scamming” families, and Sen. Ruben Gallego of Arizona introduced legislation aimed at curbing so-called “surveillance pricing.”

The context: A report from Consumer Reports and Groundwork Collaborative found that Instacart customers were charged different prices for identical products, with price gaps as wide as 23%. The algorithmic pricing tests spanned multiple retail partners, including Albertsons, Costco, Kroger, Safeway, Target, and Sprouts Farmers Market.

Amid the backlash, Instacart shut down the pricing technology, while maintaining that it did not use demographic data and did not engage in dynamic or surveillance pricing.

Implications for brands: Even if Instacart ultimately avoids legal or regulatory penalties, the episode has meaningfully hurt its brand. Grocery shopping is a high-frequency category built on long-standing consumer relationships. A perception that prices may vary unfairly undermines confidence at a time when consumers are highly price-sensitive and have ample alternatives—from retailer-owned apps to Amazon and other delivery platforms. Once trust is lost, winning it back can be far more costly than any fine.

This content is part of EMARKETER’s subscription Briefings, where we pair daily updates with data and analysis from forecasts and research reports. Our Briefings prepare you to start your day informed, to provide critical insights in an important meeting, and to understand the context of what’s happening in your industry. Non-clients can click here to get a demo of our full platform and coverage.

You've read 0 of 2 free articles this month.

Get more articles - create your free account today!