Marketers should consider building their own analytics platforms to get a more complete view of the customer, as was the case for Cramer-Krasselt, according to Chris Wexler, senior vice president of media and analytics for the ad agency.
Did you consider hiring a vendor to handle your analytics?
The first thing we always do is look at whether we can pull it off the shelf and use a vendor—because we're not a development shop; that's not what we do.
Building your own tech can take a lot of time and cost a lot of money. Why didn’t you just hire a vendor then?
Frankly, when we looked at all of [the vendors], they were half measures. All of them pulled Facebook and Google and kind of the easy ones to do. But the hard stuff is going, "OK, how do we get TV and over-the-top [OTT] and print custom content into a single platform and understand how it works?" Too many of [the vendors] were so digitally-centric that we couldn't see the whole picture.
We have identified 13 or 14 key business outcomes and each one ... requires the data to be looked at a different way. So we needed to have it in such a way that it was flexible enough to go across all of those, and there was just nothing off the shelf that could do that.
Vanity metrics can make CFOs question their marketing investments, so I’m curious what outcomes you care about aside from sales.
Our client base is diverse, so sometimes we're looking at an ecommerce element, while other times we're looking at foot traffic. Sometimes we're looking at familiarity, building institutional credibility, or we're looking at awareness.
If an advertiser decides to build its own analytics platform, are there other benefits aside from getting a more complete view of the customer?
With your own platform, you are able to feed quickly into multitouch attribution. It allows much more granular measurements than the traditional marketing mix model.