Events & Resources

Learning Center
Read through guides, explore resource hubs, and sample our coverage.
Learn More
Events
Register for an upcoming webinar and track which industry events our analysts attend.
Learn More
Podcasts
Listen to our podcast, Behind the Numbers for the latest news and insights.
Learn More

About

Our Story
Learn more about our mission and how EMARKETER came to be.
Learn More
Our Clients
Key decision-makers share why they find EMARKETER so critical.
Learn More
Our People
Take a look into our corporate culture and view our open roles.
Join the Team
Our Methodology
Rigorous proprietary data vetting strips biases and produces superior insights.
Learn More
Newsroom
See our latest press releases, news articles or download our press kit.
Learn More
Contact Us
Speak to a member of our team to learn more about EMARKETER.
Contact Us

How Publishers Can Move Completely to Server-Side Bidding

Building tech internally is one way to combat latency

Purch is one publisher that is aching to give header bidding a makeover.

When digital ad buying first became automated, publishers primarily used a tactic called waterfalling that passed bids sequentially from one exchange to the next. But a few years ago, publishers began adopting a new method of ad selling called header bidding that allowed them to offer inventory to multiple ad exchanges simultaneously before making calls to their ad servers.

Publishers liked header bidding because it raised their ad prices. But its main drawback was that sending all those bid requests at once dragged down page load speeds. So along came server-side bidding, which mitigated the delay by moving ad calls from users’ browsers to web servers.

Since last fall, the number of top US websites using server-side bidding has increased by more than 50%, according to ServerBid. But most of those sites use a hybrid of browser-side bidding and server-side bidding. Purch, which owns websites like Top Ten Reviews and Live Science, is the rare publisher that sells all of its programmatic inventory through server-side bidding.

Purch tried the hybrid approach for a while before going completely server-side, according to its chief revenue officer, Mike Kisseberth.

“When we got enough demand partners on the server side, we did a test of unplugging those bigger [browser-side] demand partners and saw that the yield impact was zero,” Kisseberth said. “We were excited about that because [going completely server-side] could get us that speed gain.”

One of the main reasons publishers are reluctant to move completely to server-side bidding is because there are a few supply-side platforms (SSPs) that won’t adopt server-based integrations, according to Kisseberth. “There is a fear that unplugging that client-side connection and losing one of those big demand partners will crush their overall yield, so publishers put up with latency.”

After Purch built its own ad tech products, it started licensing them to other publishers. Nearly 40 SSPs plug into its header bidding product, and about 20% of Purch's total revenues come from licensing tech.

As Purch becomes more akin to an ad tech vendor, it's reorganizing itself. At the end of last year, it spun its ad tech operation into a separate business unit.

“Most of the technology that we have built over the years we have just done iteratively for our properties,” Kisseberth said. “We decided at the end of the year that it made sense to operationalize the team and make it a separate group.”

You've read 0 of 2 free articles this month.

Create an account for uninterrupted access to select articles.
Create a Free Account