The news: A federal court threw out the FTC’s antitrust complaint into Facebook, as well as a connected suit filed by 48 state attorneys general, saying the FTC failed to prove Facebook holds monopoly power in the US social network market.
How we got here: The FTC’s case, filed late last year, claimed Facebook acted as a monopoly power by opting to buy upstart competitors like Instagram and WhatsApp rather than compete with them.
Though this week’s ruling marks a significant blow to the agency, the FTC can still amend its complaint with more clarity and continue its case. Meanwhile, in a separate ruling, the court dismissed a suit from 48 state attorneys general, arguing they had waited too long to bring their suit.
Further rubbing salt in the FTC’s wound, Facebook’s stock price immediately surged following the ruling, and within hours the company surpassed a market capitalization of $1 trillion for the first time in its history, per Mashable.
More on this: The FTC’s lawsuit was deemed “legally insufficient” because it failed to provide concrete details on what a social media network was, or how dominant Facebook’s market share is or was in the past.
In his ruling, the US District Judge pithily wrote, “it is almost as if [the FTC] expects the Court to simply nod to the conventional wisdom that Facebook is a monopolist.” Even if the FTC does amend its complaint, the ruling would add “complexity and delay to a case that was already going to be difficult,” former FTC Chairman William Kovacic told The Wall Street Journal.
The challenge: This week’s ruling highlights the limitations of the consumer welfare standard when attempting to regulate internet companies that often offer free or low-price products to consumers. The ruling similarly showcases the limits of the FTC’s enforcement power—but that could act as a catalyst to push through recent bipartisan attempts at major legislative antitrust reform.