The news: JPMorgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and PNC Financial Services are reportedly considering acquiring Fiserv’s debit rails, per The Wall Street Journal.

This would let the banks charge higher interchange fees on debit transactions due to a loophole in the Durbin Amendment.

How we got here: Banks are looking for new ways to improve their card economics. Capital One acquired Discover last year, giving it the ability to run its debit and credit cards on its own network. This could help the bank beef up its debit card rewards—and potentially peel members away from other banks.

At the same time, Fiserv has been struggling for multiple quarters. A cash injection from the sale of its debit rails could give the payments firm a much-needed boost.

Why this matters: Debit rails owned by four of the largest banks in the US (all of which have also collaborated on projects like Zelle and Paze) could transform their debit products. Debit dominates US payment transaction volume, per the Federal Reserve.

With the boost in debit interchange, issuers could return value to debit cardholders with enhanced rewards to lock in loyalty. This could help issuers acquire younger customers who favor debit and flexible credentials and shoppers who wield debit cards as a budgeting tool.

Zoom in: This is far from a done deal—banks have only held preliminary, tentative discussions, per The Journal. But even if they came to an agreement, the sale would likely require:

• An antitrust review by the Department of Justice and/or Federal Trade Commission
• Banking regulator approval
• Significant political scrutiny from Congress, merchant groups, and consumer advocates who may view the deal as an attempt to circumvent interchange fee caps 

Implications for issuers: The proposal would give participating banks greater control over payment processing, strengthening their debit revenues and reducing reliance on third-party networks. 

At the same time, it could reignite a long-running debate over whether higher interchange revenues benefit consumers through better banking services or instead merely increase costs for merchants and, in turn, shoppers. If the deal moves forward, participating banks would likely face pressure to demonstrate that any additional revenues translate into tangible customer benefits rather than higher profits.

This content is part of EMARKETER’s subscription Briefings, where we pair daily updates with data and analysis from forecasts and research reports. Our Briefings prepare you to start your day informed, to provide critical insights in an important meeting, and to understand the context of what’s happening in your industry. Non-clients can click here to get a demo of our full platform and coverage.