Events & Resources

Learning Center
Read through guides, explore resource hubs, and sample our coverage.
Learn More
Events
Register for an upcoming webinar and track which industry events our analysts attend.
Learn More
Podcasts
Listen to our podcast, Behind the Numbers for the latest news and insights.
Learn More

About

Our Story
Learn more about our mission and how EMARKETER came to be.
Learn More
Our Clients
Key decision-makers share why they find EMARKETER so critical.
Learn More
Our People
Take a look into our corporate culture and view our open roles.
Join the Team
Our Methodology
Rigorous proprietary data vetting strips biases and produces superior insights.
Learn More
Newsroom
See our latest press releases, news articles or download our press kit.
Learn More
Contact Us
Speak to a member of our team to learn more about EMARKETER.
Contact Us
Already have a subscription?Sign In

Log in to see the full chart

Log in or register for a free account to get full, unrestricted access to this chart

Lock icon
Lock icon

Log in to see the full chart

June 2, 2020

Coronavirus Impact: Types of Vacations US Internet Users Expect to Take, May 2020 (% of respondents)

Coronavirus Impact: Types of Vacations US Internet Users Expect to Take, May 2020 (% of respondents)

Methodology

Data is from the June 2020 GlobalWebIndex report titled "Coronavirus Research Release: Multi-Market Research Wave 4." 17,143 internet users worldwide ages 16-64 were surveyed online during May 19-26, 2020. The survey was conducted in Australia (n=1,053), Belgium (n=544), Brazil (n=1,041), Canada (n=770), China (n=1,050), France (n=1,033), Germany (n=1,062), India (n=1,072), Ireland (n=532), Italy (n=1,069), Japan (n=788), New Zealand (n=554), Philippines (n=764), Poland (n=559), Romania (n=534), Singapore (n=770), South Africa (n=531), Spain (n=1,086), the UK (n=1,068) and the US (n=1,263). Responses in each country have been weighted for age, gender and education level. Given the speed of this survey in response to the coronavirus, some countries had comparatively few responses in the 16-24 or 55-64 age groups. Where necessary, weightings have been combined with adjacent age groups.